Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Deney Wassermann vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wassermann vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Deney Wassermann vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wassermann 1 - 0 Decamps
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wassermann has won 52.58% of points on their second serve, while Decamps has won 49.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wassermann, in recent form, has won 50.48% of their opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 55.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.68% and 35.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wassermann has saved 60.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 56.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wassermann has won 50% of matches played (W/L 19/ 19), with Decamps winning 63.79% (W/L 37/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 71/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/ 18), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 32/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wassermann winning 1 times and Decamps being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Wassermann winning 2 and Decamps winning 1. The last match between Wassermann and Decamps was at the M15 Zahra, 13-12-2023, First, Hard with Deney Wassermann getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wassermann and Decamps have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wassermann winning 1 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wassermann winning 0, and Decamps 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wassermann has played against opponents with an average rank of 190.68 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 192.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wassermann has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wassermann has converted 38.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 45.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
781
Rank
696
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
643
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
59% (102-72)
Career Total W/L
63% (164-95)
53% (9-8)
YTD W/L
68% (21-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wassermann VS Decamps H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:0 | 2:23:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (63/104) | 66% (63/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (41/63) | 59% (37/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (21/41) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 18% (2/11) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (43/95) | 40% (42/104) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Wassermann VS Decamps H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Deney Wassermann
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Deney Wassermann | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 68% (21/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) | 66% (45/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (185/163) | 57% (356/268) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 101 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.88 | 167.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (619/1105) | 62% (1089/1764) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (442/619) | 68% (745/1089) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (254/486) | 49% (331/675) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (45/123) | 47% (107/228) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (452/1133) | 44% (842/1893) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (9/8) | 70% (19/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (9/14) | 69% (20/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 100% (18/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (18/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Deney Wassermann
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
11
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Kuzey Cekirge
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Deney Wassermann
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Gabriel Decamps
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Jonas Trinker
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Marino Jakic
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Gabriel Decamps
52%
(
53 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Wassermann Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
